The proliferation of unmanned aerial systems across contemporary battlefields has fundamentally altered the threat landscape, demanding comprehensive counter-drone solutions that can address everything from commercial quadcopters to sophisticated military UAVs. Ukraine produced at least 1 million drones last year, and has plans to make 2.5 million in 2025, while by early 2025, drones were accounting for 60% to 70% of the damage and destruction caused to Russian equipment in the war. This unprecedented scale of drone deployment has created an urgent demand for effective C-UAS technologies.
Executive Summary
Based on operational data from Ukraine and Middle East conflicts, modern counter-drone systems have evolved into sophisticated multi-layered defense architectures. Some 1,300 drones were launched at Israel since the start of the war on October 7, 2023, from all fronts — Lebanon, Gaza, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Iran. According to IDF data, 231 of the drones struck Israel. The most effective solutions combine traditional kinetic systems with novel directed energy weapons and electronic warfare capabilities, achieving interception rates exceeding 90% when properly integrated.
Traditional Ground-Based Air Defense Solutions
Patriot and SAMP/T Integration
Traditional surface-to-air missile systems like Patriot and SAMP/T have demonstrated effectiveness against larger drone threats, particularly Group 3 and Group 4 UAVs. Ukraine’s deployment demonstrated combat efficacy, with a SAMP/T battery intercepting a Russian jet at 90-mile ranges in March 2025. Each $500 million battery can fire 8 missiles in 10 seconds. However, these systems face cost-effectiveness challenges when engaging smaller threats, with interceptor costs ranging from $480,000 (Stinger) to $2.1 million (Standard Missile-2).
Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) Systems
Modern SHORAD platforms have adapted to address the drone threat through specialized ammunition and fire control systems. Electric Optic Systems based in Australia recently sent 160 of its Slinger counter-drone systems (external link) to Ukraine. Using a Bushmaster M230LF 30 x 113mm cannon, coupled with proximity fused, high explosive fragmentation rounds, the Slinger can automatically track and eliminate moving targets beyond 800 meters. These systems represent the bridge between traditional air defense and specialized C-UAS capabilities.
Dedicated Kinetic Solutions
Purpose-built kinetic interceptors like the Coyote Block 2 provide mid-range solutions for drone threats. The Army in February inked a deal with defense contractor Raytheon for hundreds of Coyote Block 2C interceptors – at $100,000 a shot – explicitly to support its counter-drone initiatives in the Middle East. These interceptors offer improved cost-effectiveness compared to traditional missiles while maintaining kinetic kill capabilities.
Electronic Warfare Solutions
Radio Frequency Jamming
Electronic warfare represents the first line of defense against drone threats, though its effectiveness has diminished with technological advances. Shutyi marks the end of 2024 as a turning point—the moment when conventional EW systems began to collapse. The reason: unjammable fiber-optic FPV drones. Traditional RF jamming systems face increasing challenges from fiber-optic guided drones and AI-enabled autonomous systems.
GPS Spoofing and Navigation Disruption
Another tactic is spoofing — using fake GPS signals to trick drones into thinking they’re somewhere they’re not and steering them off course. GPS spoofing has proven effective against commercial and basic military drones, though sophisticated systems with inertial navigation remain resilient.
Multi-Spectrum Electronic Attack
Advanced EW systems combine multiple attack vectors. Lithuania recently delivered thousands of the Skywiper Electronic Drone Mitigation 4 System (EDM4S) and the Skywiper Omni. NT Service developed these devices to interrupt the RF control and navigation systems in drones, causing them to lose control. These systems provide effective coverage against conventional drone threats at ranges up to 5 kilometers.
Directed Energy Solutions
High-Energy Laser Systems
Directed energy weapons have emerged as game-changing technology for counter-drone operations. Israel has used a new air defense laser to shoot down Hezbollah drones in the current conflict in the Middle East, it has been confirmed. The Iron Beam system represents the world’s first operationally deployed combat laser, successfully engaging multiple aerial targets.
Cost Advantages:
In April 2022, Israel’s then-Prime Minister Naftali Bennett stated that Iron Beam was able to shoot down targets at a cost of $3.50 per shot. This represents a dramatic cost reduction compared to traditional interceptors, enabling sustainable defense against mass drone attacks.
Operational Capabilities:
Modern laser systems demonstrate impressive performance metrics:
- The drone defence system from EOS uses a powerful laser as its DE source. It has disabled Group 1 drones at an effective rate of 20 drones per minute – at ranges of more than 1,000 metres
- The Army has not only deployed a platoon of four 50-kilowatt Directed Energy Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense, or DE M-SHORAD, prototypes to Central Command for “real world testing,” but taken possession of its most powerful laser yet – the 300-kilowatt Indirect Fire Protection Capability-High Energy Laser
High-Power Microwave Systems
Microwave-based directed energy weapons excel against drone swarms. When a swarm of drones is detected, THOR emits a wide-area burst of microwave energy that disables several drones simultaneously, making it highly effective against coordinated, large-scale drone attacks that are designed to overwhelm conventional defenses. These systems address the primary tactical challenge of engaging multiple targets simultaneously.
Novel Solutions and Emerging Technologies
Drone-on-Drone Interceptors
Rafael has also integrated SpearUAV’s Viper I interceptor drone—a critical innovation in “drone-on-drone” warfare. Deployed from a four-canister launcher mounted on the vehicle’s side, the Viper I is an autonomous, AI-powered interceptor equipped with high-speed propulsion and a lethal payload. These systems provide precision engagement capabilities while maintaining cost-effectiveness for specific threat scenarios.
Artificial Intelligence Integration
AI-powered drone threat prediction systems are rapidly advancing, with the potential to predict a drone’s behavior before it becomes a risk. The key strength of AI is its ability to rapidly process vast amounts of data, something that has become key for counter-UAS. AI integration enables autonomous target identification, tracking, and engagement across multiple sensor platforms.
Net-Based Capture Systems
Non-destructive engagement methods like the SkyWall systems offer unique advantages for specific scenarios, particularly in urban environments where debris mitigation is critical. These systems enable intact drone capture for intelligence analysis while minimizing collateral damage.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Threat-Specific Cost Considerations
The economic dimension of counter-drone warfare has become critical as drone costs continue to decrease while defensive systems remain expensive. Current cost structures reveal significant disparities:
Commercial Drone Threats ($500-2,000 per unit):
- Electronic warfare: $1-10 per engagement
- Directed energy: $3.50-50 per shot
- Kinetic interceptors: $100,000+ per engagement
Military Drone Threats ($10,000-100,000+ per unit):
- Traditional SAMs: $480,000-2.1 million per interceptor
- Specialized C-UAS missiles: $100,000 per shot
- Directed energy: $3.50-50 per shot
Long-Term Economic Viability
‘The cost per shot is already below what customers are willing to pay, so it’s very cost-effective.’ Still, he noted that the current costs of many models are ‘higher than what you would want to pay if you’re buying 1000 systems’, which could be required in the future battlespace. Directed energy systems demonstrate superior long-term economics despite higher initial investment costs.
Layered Defense Economics
Collectively, these layers provide robust protection, countering 94% of hostile drone threats. The most cost-effective solutions employ layered architectures that match threat types with appropriate countermeasures, avoiding expensive over-engagement scenarios.
Regional Implementation Lessons
Ukraine Experience
As Russian drones go offline, Ukraine’s jammers fall silent. A frontline commander explains why old defenses don’t work — and what might. Ukrainian forces have pioneered adaptive counter-drone tactics, emphasizing the importance of flexible, rapidly deployable systems that can evolve with changing threats.
Middle East Deployments
The UAV threat is an evolving and multi-arena threat that has expanded to all our combat sectors, led by Iran and its proxies. This threat has already extracted a heavy human toll from us, which is why we have mobilized all tools to develop an effective response. Israeli experience emphasizes the critical importance of 360-degree protection and rapid response capabilities.
Strategic Recommendations
Multi-Layered Architecture
Effective counter-drone systems require integration of multiple technologies:
- Detection Layer: Radar, electro-optical, and acoustic sensors
- Soft-Kill Layer: Electronic warfare and GPS jamming
- Hard-Kill Layer: Directed energy and kinetic interceptors
- Command Integration: AI-enabled threat assessment and engagement coordination
Technology Investment Priorities
Based on operational evidence, investment should prioritize:
- Directed Energy Systems: Superior cost-effectiveness for sustained operations
- AI Integration: Essential for managing complex multi-threat environments
- Mobile Platforms: Critical for tactical flexibility
- Sensor Fusion: Necessary for reliable detection in contested environments
Future Development Requirements
As research progresses, we can expect to see counter-UAS missiles that strike a balance between cost and capability. These systems will likely feature enhanced targeting precision, scalability to address multiple threats and integration with broader air defense networks. Future systems must address autonomous drone threats while maintaining economic viability.
Conclusion
The evolving drone threat requires comprehensive, adaptable defense solutions that balance effectiveness with economic sustainability. The Pentagon currently spends roughly $1 billion a year on directed-energy weapons and has 31 different systems at various stages of development, the majority of which are laser systems. Directed energy weapons have emerged as the most promising long-term solution, offering sustainable cost structures for mass engagement scenarios.
The integration of AI, mobile platforms, and multi-spectrum engagement capabilities represents the future of counter-drone warfare. Nations must invest in layered defense architectures that can adapt to rapidly evolving threats while maintaining operational effectiveness across diverse scenarios. The experiences from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrate that successful counter-drone operations require continuous technological adaptation and comprehensive training programs.
For the latest developments in air defense technology and detailed system comparisons, continue following our analysis at norskluftvern.com
