Innsikt, Langtrekkende luftvern, Luftvern

David’s Sling vs. SAMP/T Air and Missile Defense Systems Comparison

Introduction

The modern security landscape is characterized by an increasing proliferation of sophisticated aerial threats, including ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, rockets, and advanced aircraft. This necessitates the development and deployment of robust air and missile defense systems capable of effectively countering these evolving dangers. Among the advanced systems designed for this purpose are the David’s Sling, an Israeli medium-to-long-range air defense system, and the SAMP/T (Sol-Air Moyenne Portée Terrestre), a Franco-Italian medium-range surface-to-air missile system. This article provides a detailed technical comparison of these two systems, examining their underlying architecture, technical specifications, and operational capabilities.

David’s Sling, also known as the Magic Wand, represents a crucial element of Israel’s multi-layered missile defense architecture 1. Co-developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems of Israel and the American defense company Raytheon, it is designed to bridge the gap between the short-range Iron Dome system and the long-range Arrow missile defense system 1. Operational since 2017, David’s Sling is intended to intercept a variety of aerial threats, including tactical ballistic missiles, medium-to-long-range rockets, and cruise missiles, thereby bolstering Israel’s defense capabilities against regional adversaries 1.

In contrast, the SAMP/T is a theater antimissile system developed by Eurosam, a joint venture between MBDA Missile Systems and Thales of France and Italy 7. It serves as a cornerstone of Italy and France’s contributions to the North Atlantic Alliance’s tactical ballistic missile defense capability 10. Designed to protect the battlefield and sensitive tactical sites against a wide array of airborne threats, the SAMP/T is effective against high-speed targets such as tactical ballistic missiles with a range of up to 600 km, cruise missiles, combat aircraft, and unmanned combat air vehicles 7. The system is currently undergoing an upgrade to the SAMP/T NG (Next Generation) version, which promises enhanced capabilities against emerging threats, including hypersonic missiles, with deliveries expected from 2025 12. This analysis will delve into the technical intricacies of both systems to provide a comprehensive comparative overview.

David’s Sling: System Architecture and Technical Specifications

David’s Sling occupies the middle tier of Israel’s layered defense system, providing protection against threats that fall outside the engagement envelope of the shorter-range Iron Dome and the longer-range Arrow systems 1. This system was developed through a collaborative effort between Israel’s Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and the American company Raytheon, reflecting a strategic partnership to enhance Israel’s missile defense capabilities 1. Its introduction into service in 2017 marked a significant step in modernizing Israel’s air defenses, replacing older systems like the US Patriot and MIM-23 Hawk 2.

The primary interceptor of the David’s Sling system is the Stunner missile, also sometimes referred to as SkyCeptor, particularly in Raytheon’s publications 1. This two-stage missile is powered by a multi-pulse propulsion system, enabling it to achieve high speeds of up to Mach 7.5 1. It boasts an interception range of 40 to 300 km, allowing it to engage threats at a considerable distance 1. The Stunner missile can intercept targets at altitudes of up to 15 km 1. However, one report indicates a potential interception altitude of 50-70 km against lower-altitude ballistic missiles, suggesting a capability that can adapt to different threat profiles 24. Guidance for the Stunner missile is provided through a combination of midcourse updates from the ground-based radar system and terminal guidance using a sophisticated dual electro-optical/imaging infrared (EO/IR) sensor coupled with an active radar seeker, specifically an AESA millimeter 3D radar 1. Notably, the Stunner employs a hit-to-kill mechanism, meaning it destroys targets through direct physical impact, relying on its kinetic energy rather than a traditional warhead 1. A variant of the Stunner, known as SkyCeptor, has been developed by Raytheon with the aim of providing a more cost-effective interceptor for short- to medium-range ballistic and cruise missiles 1.

The radar system integral to David’s Sling is the EL/M-2084 Multi-Mission Radar (MMR), developed by Elta Systems, a subsidiary of Israel Aerospace Industries 1. This advanced radar utilizes Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) technology and operates in the S-band frequency 20. It is capable of detecting targets at ranges of up to 250-300 km 1, and in surveillance mode, its detection range can extend up to 474 km 20. The EL/M-2084 MMR can track up to 1100 targets simultaneously in surveillance mode and up to 200 targets per minute when in fire control mode 20. This radar serves a dual function, providing both air surveillance and fire control capabilities, generating a real-time, three-dimensional air situation picture 20. Furthermore, it can also locate the origin and predicted impact point of enemy artillery fire, enhancing the system’s overall utility 25.

The command and control element of David’s Sling is known as the “Golden Almond,” developed by Elisra, a subsidiary of Elbit Systems 6. This center is responsible for critical functions such as threat assessment, mission planning, and the control of interception operations 6. The Golden Almond is seamlessly integrated with the Home Front Command’s command and control systems and also possesses its own independent interception management capabilities 4. This integration allows for effective coordination within Israel’s broader national defense framework and enables interfacing with external systems to maintain a comprehensive aerial defense picture 6.

The David’s Sling system employs a Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) mounted on a two-axles trailer 1. Each TEL unit typically carries 6 to 12 Stunner interceptor missiles, housed in individual canisters 1. The missiles are launched vertically from these canisters, which significantly reduces the time required for launch preparation and improves the system’s overall response time 1. This mobile launcher platform enhances the system’s survivability and allows for flexible deployment to protect strategically important areas.

David’s Sling is designed to intercept a wide range of aerial threats, including tactical ballistic missiles, medium-to-long-range rockets, cruise missiles, enemy planes, and drones 1. It has demonstrated the capability to defeat specific threats such as the Iranian Fajr-5, BM-25, and Fateh-110 missiles, the Syrian M-600 and Khaibar-1 rockets, and Scud missiles 2. Furthermore, it is designed to counter more advanced tactical ballistic missiles like the Russian Iskander and the Chinese DF-15 1. The system has also been used operationally to intercept rockets fired from Gaza and Lebanon, including the Badr-3 and Ayyash-250 4. While these instances highlight the system’s effectiveness, reports also indicate potential limitations in intercepting certain types of attacks, underscoring the complexities of real-world combat scenarios 30.

SAMP/T: System Architecture and Technical Specifications

The SAMP/T system is a medium-range air and missile defense platform primarily intended for theater protection of critical assets and deployed military forces 12. Developed as a joint contribution by France and Italy to NATO’s tactical ballistic missile defense capabilities, it is operated by both nations 8. The system is a product of Eurosam, a consortium formed by MBDA Missile Systems and Thales 7. An upgraded version, the SAMP/T NG, is currently under development and slated for delivery starting in 2025, promising enhanced capabilities against a wider range of modern threats, including hypersonic missiles 12.

SAMP/T utilizes the Aster family of missiles, which includes the shorter-range Aster 15 and the longer-range Aster 30 1. Both are two-stage missiles employing a solid propellant booster 7. The Aster 15 achieves a speed of Mach 3 with a range exceeding 30 km, while the Aster 30 reaches Mach 4.5 and has a range of up to 120 km for the Block 0 and 1 versions, extending to over 150 km for the Block 1NT and NG variants 7. The Aster 30 can intercept targets at altitudes up to 20 km for the initial blocks and around 25 km for the Block 1NT 7. Guidance is provided through inertial navigation with uplink data updates, transitioning to an active RF seeker for terminal homing 7. The Aster missiles are equipped with a blast fragmentation warhead and a proximity fuze, designed to effectively engage a wide variety of targets, including tactical ballistic missiles 7. The Aster 30 Block 1 variant specifically targets short-range ballistic missiles with ranges up to 600 km, while the Block 1NT is designed to counter medium-range ballistic missiles with ranges up to 1500 km 7. The missiles incorporate “PIF-PAF” technology, which combines powerful aerodynamic control with direct thrust vector control, providing exceptional maneuverability 13.

The radar system for the standard SAMP/T is the Arabel multi-function electronic scanning radar 7. In the upgraded SAMP/T NG, this is replaced by either the Ground Fire 300 or the Kronos Grand Mobile High Power AESA radars, which offer 360° simultaneous coverage 7. These next-generation radars have a detection range of ≥ 350 km and can track over 1000 targets 12. The standard Arabel radar also provides 360-degree coverage and can track 100 aerial targets while simultaneously engaging 10 8. The transition to AESA radar technology in the NG version represents a significant enhancement in performance, particularly against advanced and maneuvering threats.

The Engagement Module serves as the command and control center for a SAMP/T battery 8. It is responsible for coordinating all aspects of the system’s operation, including processing radar data, managing target engagements, and providing a comprehensive operational picture 13. The system can operate autonomously or be integrated into a larger air defense network, emphasizing its interoperability within coalition forces, particularly NATO 13. The design of the SAMP/T, especially the NG version, aims for a streamlined crew requirement, enhancing its operational efficiency 13.

The SAMP/T employs a vertical ground launcher mounted on highly mobile platforms, typically 8×8 trucks 7. Each launcher can hold 8 Aster missiles, and a typical battery for the NG version includes up to 6 launchers, providing a total of 48 missiles ready for launch 12. The vertical launch capability allows for rapid engagement of threats from any direction, providing full 360-degree coverage 8. The system boasts a high rate of fire, capable of launching all 8 missiles from a single launcher in approximately 10 seconds 9. Furthermore, the SAMP/T is designed for high tactical and strategic mobility, with the ability to be transported by air in C130-class aircraft, facilitating rapid deployment to different operational theaters 9.

The SAMP/T is designed to intercept a broad spectrum of airborne threats, including tactical ballistic missiles (with enhanced capabilities against longer-range missiles in the NG version), cruise missiles, anti-radiation missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles, helicopters, and combat aircraft 7. It has demonstrated its anti-ballistic missile capabilities against short-range missiles and is being upgraded to counter medium-range and even hypersonic threats 7. Operational experience includes deployment in Ukraine, where it has reportedly successfully intercepted Russian fighter aircraft 31, though some reports suggest potential challenges against certain ballistic missile types 31.

Comparative Technical Analysis

David’s Sling (Stunner) / SAMP/T (Aster 30 Block 1NT/NG)

Interceptor Range: 40-300 km / >150 km

Interceptor Speed: Mach 7.5 / Mach 4.5

Interceptor Altitude: Up to 15 km (potentially higher) / Up to 25 km class

Kill Mechanism: Hit-to-kill / Blast fragmentation

Radar Type: EL/M-2084 AESA / Ground Fire 300/Kronos Grand Mobile HP AESA (NG)

Radar Detection Range: Up to 474 km (surveillance) / ≥ 350 km

Targets: TBMs, rockets, cruise missiles, aircraft, drones / TBMs, cruise missiles, anti-radiation missiles, UAVs, helicopters, aircraft

Radar: EL/M-2084 (David’s Sling) / Arabel (SAMP/T), Ground Fire 300/Kronos Grand Mobile HP (SAMP/T NG)

Technology: AESA / Rotating ESA, AESA

Frequency Band: S-band / Not specified, Not specified

Max Detection Range: Up to 474 km / Not specified, ≥ 350 km

Tracking Capacity: Up to 1100 targets / 100 targets, > 1000 targets

Coverage: 360° (rotating) / 360°, 360° (simultaneous)

Multi-Mission: Yes / Yes, Yes

Interceptor Missile Performance

David’s Sling’s Stunner missile generally offers a longer maximum interception range compared to the current SAMP/T’s Aster 30, potentially providing a larger defensive umbrella against certain threats 1. However, the Aster family includes the Aster 15, offering a shorter-range engagement option, providing flexibility 7. The Stunner’s significantly higher speed of Mach 7.5 compared to the Aster 30’s Mach 4.5 suggests a potential advantage in intercepting fast-moving targets, particularly in the terminal phase of ballistic missile flight 1. In terms of altitude, the Aster 30 demonstrates a higher maximum interception altitude, indicating a better capability against threats with more lofted trajectories 7. A fundamental difference lies in the kill mechanism: David’s Sling utilizes a hit-to-kill approach, relying on direct impact, which can be advantageous against targets with separated warheads or countermeasures 1. In contrast, SAMP/T employs a blast fragmentation warhead, which might be more effective against a broader range of targets, including aircraft, by creating a lethal radius of fragments 7. Both systems incorporate advanced features for high maneuverability, crucial for intercepting agile threats 4.

Radar System Capabilities

Both David’s Sling and the upgraded SAMP/T NG utilize advanced AESA radar technology, which generally offers superior performance in detection range, tracking capacity, and resistance to electronic countermeasures compared to traditional radar systems 7. The EL/M-2084 radar of David’s Sling boasts a longer maximum detection range in surveillance mode 20, while the SAMP/T NG radars also offer a substantial detection range 12. Both systems demonstrate a high tracking capacity, essential for handling complex, multi-target scenarios 12. A key difference is in coverage: SAMP/T NG provides 360° simultaneous coverage with its AESA radars, offering an advantage in rapid response to threats from any direction 8. The EL/M-2084 also achieves 360° coverage but through mechanical rotation in surveillance mode 20.

Command and Control and Network Integration

Both systems feature sophisticated command and control architectures designed for effective threat assessment, engagement planning, and interception management 6. SAMP/T’s development and deployment within a NATO framework emphasize its interoperability with allied air defense systems, adhering to standardized protocols and data links 8. David’s Sling, while also integrated within a broader national defense network, is primarily tailored to Israel’s specific operational requirements and regional context 4.

Target Engagement Envelope

David’s Sling is specifically designed to fill the medium-to-long-range gap in Israel’s air defenses, focusing on intercepting rockets and short-range ballistic missiles 1. SAMP/T, on the other hand, is engineered to counter a more diverse array of threats, including aircraft, cruise missiles, and tactical ballistic missiles, with the NG version further enhancing its capabilities against advanced threats like hypersonic missiles and longer-range ballistic missiles 7.

Mobility and Deployment

Both systems exhibit high mobility, utilizing truck-mounted launcher platforms that allow for rapid deployment and relocation, enhancing survivability 1. SAMP/T’s air transportability in C130-class aircraft provides an added dimension of strategic mobility, enabling quicker deployment over longer distances, which aligns with its role within NATO’s multinational defense framework 9.

Strengths and Limitations

David’s Sling

The hit-to-kill mechanism of David’s Sling is a significant strength, offering a potentially more effective means of neutralizing ballistic missiles, particularly those with advanced countermeasures or separating warheads 1. Its high interceptor speed provides a crucial advantage in engaging fast-moving threats within its operational range 1. The advanced seeker technology, incorporating both EO/IR and radar sensors, ensures robust targeting capabilities across various environmental conditions and against sophisticated threats 1. The EL/M-2084 multi-mission radar enhances the system’s overall effectiveness by providing excellent situational awareness, fire control, and even artillery counter-battery capabilities 1. The development of the SkyCeptor variant suggests an effort to provide a more cost-effective solution for addressing certain types of threats 1.

However, David’s Sling’s maximum interception altitude is relatively lower compared to SAMP/T, which might limit its effectiveness against very high-altitude ballistic missile trajectories 1. The system relies on a single primary interceptor type, which offers less flexibility compared to SAMP/T’s family of Aster missiles with varying range and altitude capabilities. Additionally, some reports have indicated potential performance issues against specific types of ballistic missile attacks, suggesting that its effectiveness might vary depending on the nature of the threat 30.

SAMP/T

SAMP/T’s higher maximum interception altitude allows it to engage threats at greater heights, potentially including longer-range ballistic missiles with lofted trajectories 7. The Aster missile family provides a range of interceptor options, offering flexibility to address different threat profiles based on range and altitude requirements 1. The NG version’s 360° simultaneous radar coverage is a significant advantage, enabling rapid engagement of threats from any direction 8. Its high rate of fire allows it to engage multiple targets in quick succession, which is crucial for countering saturation attacks 9. As a key contributor to NATO’s air defense, SAMP/T is designed for seamless interoperability within allied networks, adhering to common standards and procedures 8. The system is specifically designed with an anti-ballistic missile capability, targeting short- and medium-range ballistic missiles 7.

A potential limitation of SAMP/T is its blast fragmentation warhead, which might be less effective against certain types of advanced ballistic missile threats compared to the direct impact of a hit-to-kill mechanism 7. Its interceptor speed is also lower than that of David’s Sling, potentially making it less effective against very high-speed targets in their terminal phase 7. Furthermore, reports from its deployment in Ukraine have suggested potential software limitations that might affect its ability to intercept certain ballistic missiles, indicating that real-world performance can be influenced by various factors 31.

Conclusion

David’s Sling and SAMP/T represent advanced medium-range air and missile defense systems, each with unique technical characteristics tailored to their specific operational contexts and strategic requirements. David’s Sling, with its high-speed, hit-to-kill Stunner missile and advanced multi-mission radar, is optimized for intercepting medium-to-long-range rockets and short-range ballistic missiles within Israel’s layered defense architecture. Its strengths lie in its effectiveness against ballistic missile threats through direct impact and its sophisticated sensor suite. However, its lower maximum interception altitude and reliance on a single interceptor type present certain limitations.

SAMP/T, with its family of Aster missiles and emphasis on NATO interoperability, offers a more versatile solution capable of engaging a broader spectrum of airborne threats, including aircraft, cruise missiles, and tactical ballistic missiles. Its higher interception altitude and the upcoming NG version with enhanced radar capabilities and hypersonic missile defense suggest a continuous evolution towards countering increasingly sophisticated threats. While its blast fragmentation warhead and lower interceptor speed compared to David’s Sling might present trade-offs in certain scenarios, its 360° coverage and high rate of fire provide significant advantages in handling complex air defense situations.

Ultimately, the suitability of each system depends on the specific threat environment, operational needs, and strategic priorities of the user nation. David’s Sling appears highly effective in addressing the regional ballistic missile and rocket threats faced by Israel, while SAMP/T offers a more broadly applicable solution for theater defense within a multinational framework like NATO. The ongoing development and upgrades to both systems indicate a continued commitment to enhancing their capabilities against the evolving landscape of aerial threats.

References

  1. David’s Sling – Army Recognition, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://armyrecognition.com/military-products/army/air-defense-systems/air-defense-vehicles/davids-sling
  2. David’s Sling (Israel) – Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/defense-systems/davids-sling-israel/
  3. Iron Dome and David’s Sling: Key Developers and Their Roles in Missile Defense Systems, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.levelfields.ai/news/iron-dome-and-davids-sling-key-developers-and-their-roles-in-missile-defense-systems
  4. David’s Sling – Wikipedia, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David%27s_Sling
  5. David’s Sling System and SkyCeptor Missile | Raytheon – RTX, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.rtx.com/raytheon/what-we-do/integrated-air-and-missile-defense/davidssling
  6. IMDO- Israel Missile Defense Organization, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://english.mod.gov.il/About/Innovative_Strength/Pages/IMDO_Israel_Missile_Defense_Organization.aspx
  7. Aster (missile family) – Wikipedia, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aster_(missile_family)
  8. SAMP/T Air Defense System (France & Italy), brukt mars 18, 2025, https://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/defense-systems/sampt-air-defense-system/
  9. SAMP/T Aster 30 MAMBA – Army Recognition, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://armyrecognition.com/military-products/army/air-defense-systems/air-defense-vehicles/sampt-france-uk
  10. SAMP-T | Thales Group, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide/defence/samp-t
  11. Augmentation of Turkey’s Air Defence – NATO, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2016_07/20160704_1607-factsheet-patriot_en.pdf
  12. SAMP/T NG | Eurosam, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://eurosam.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Brochure-SAMPT-NG-MoyenOrient-US-V2.pdf
  13. ASTER SAMP/T NG – MBDA, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.mbda-systems.com/media/20611/download
  14. First Italian-French SAMP/T air defence system is already in Ukraine | Ukrainska Pravda, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/05/16/7402361/
  15. ASTER SAMP/T NG – MBDA, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.mbda-systems.com/products/area-protection/aster-family/aster-sampt-ng
  16. Ground Systems Solution | EUROSAM, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://eurosam.com/ground-systems/
  17. France and Italy order new SAMP/T air defense systems, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://breakingdefense.com/2024/09/france-and-italy-order-new-samp-t-air-defense-systems/
  18. France and Italy order upgraded SAMP/T air-defense systems, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2024/09/18/france-and-italy-order-upgraded-sampt-air-defense-systems/
  19. Patriot games: How America is outgunning Europe on air defense – Politico.eu, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.politico.eu/article/us-patriot-defeat-europe-sampt-air-defense-volodymyr-zelenskyy/
  20. David’s Sling (Israel) – Missile Threat – CSIS, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://missilethreat.csis.org/defsys/davids-sling/
  21. Rafael: DAVID’s SLING – Long Range Air & Missile Defense, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.rafael.co.il/system/medium-long-range-defense-davids-sling/
  22. David’s Sling air and missile defense system – Norsk luftvern – en uavhengig blogg, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://norskluftvern.com/2024/04/23/davids-sling-air-and-missile-defense-system/
  23. ‘David’s Sling’ and ‘Arrow’ anti-missile systems: How Israel defeated Iran’s attack | WKHM-AM – Jackson, MI, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.wkhm.com/2024/10/02/davids-sling-and-arrow-anti-missile-systems-how-israel-defeated-irans-attack/
  24. David’s Sling intercepts first Hezbollah missile fired at Tel Aviv – Globes, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-davids-sling-intercepts-first-hezbollah-missile-fired-at-tel-aviv-1001490263
  25. ELM 2084 MMR (Israel) – Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/defense-systems/elm-2084-mmr-israel/
  26. EL/M-2084 3D radars will protect Czechia – CZDEFENCE, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.czdefence.com/article/el-m-2084-3d-radars-will-protect-czechia
  27. Israeli-made Iron Dome Radar Now Operational in Hungarian Air Space – Hungary Today, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://hungarytoday.hu/israeli-made-iron-dome-radar-now-operational-in-the-hungarian-air-space/
  28. EL/M-2084 MMR [Iron Dome Mod] – cmano-db.com, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://cmano-db.com/sensor/5636/
  29. EL/M-2084 – Deagel.com, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.deagel.com/Components/ELM-2084/a002389
  30. Hezbollah Strike Destroys Israeli David’s Sling Air Defence Battery as War Enters New Phase – Reports – Military Watch Magazine, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/hezbollah-davidssling-strike-new-stage
  31. Ukraine’s SAMP-T missile stock running critically low, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://english.nv.ua/russian-war/ukraine-running-out-of-missiles-for-samp-t-air-defense-systems-50498134.html
  32. SAMP/T Fact Sheet – OCCAR, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://occar.int/our-work/programmes/fsafpaams-the-next-generation-of-surfacetoair-antimissile-systems/sampt-fact-sheet
  33. Rome can’t supply more SAMP/T missiles to Kyiv, reserves low – Bulgarian Military, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2025/03/15/rome-cant-supply-more-samp-t-missiles-to-kyiv-reserves-low/
  34. Exclusive: French-made SAMP/T Air Defense System Successfully Shoots Down Russian Sukhoi Fighter Aircraft in Ukraine – Army Recognition, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/conflicts-in-the-world/russia-ukraine-war-2022/exclusive-french-made-samp-t-air-defense-system-successfully-shoots-down-russian-sukhoi-fighter-aircraft-in-ukraine
  35. Italy SAMP/T system deployed for Nato exercise in Lithuania – Air Force Technology, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/italy-sampt-nato-exercise-lithuania/
  36. Italy deploys the SAMP/T long-range ground-based air defence system as practical implementation of the Rotational NATO Air Defence Model | Lithuanian army, brukt mars 18, 2025, https://www.kariuomene.lt/en/italy-deploys-the-samp-t-long-range-ground-based-air-defence-system-as-practical-implementation-of-the-rotational-nato-air-defence-model/26353

AI-assisted article.